Apologies, I realise I might’ve misunderstood your comment. Do you actually mean that you shouldn’t worry about being a BB because it is sort of inconsequential, not that you are sure you are not one because you’ve got the “next observer-moment”?
I agree with the former, but was arguing against the latter.
No in both cases. Here I am thinking about my self as objected which has some thickness in 4-th dimensions, like Ebborians in EY post. I am simultaneously located in all places there my copies are located.
It is opposite to the view that “I am randomly selected from all my copies” as there is no selection part. I am all my copies. In that case, loosing some of the copies is not a big deal.
If I am selected from my copies, and turns out that I am BB, it means that I will disappear in the next moment – it means that I will dies next moment and it is unpleasant idea. Therefore, being inconsequential is bad.
I read it of course. What i said is related to a single observer-moment.
Apologies, I realise I might’ve misunderstood your comment. Do you actually mean that you shouldn’t worry about being a BB because it is sort of inconsequential, not that you are sure you are not one because you’ve got the “next observer-moment”?
I agree with the former, but was arguing against the latter.
No in both cases. Here I am thinking about my self as objected which has some thickness in 4-th dimensions, like Ebborians in EY post. I am simultaneously located in all places there my copies are located.
It is opposite to the view that “I am randomly selected from all my copies” as there is no selection part. I am all my copies. In that case, loosing some of the copies is not a big deal.
If I am selected from my copies, and turns out that I am BB, it means that I will disappear in the next moment – it means that I will dies next moment and it is unpleasant idea. Therefore, being inconsequential is bad.