I think my argument is more stark: I’m saying that there are fundamentally two types of credence, (A) and (B) in the comment above, and only one of them is relevant to rational decision-making.
I agree with intuition being the thing that separates Halfers and Thirders, but I’m saying that they’re fighting over irrelevant Type (B) credence—“inner” credence in the OOBR post I linked to.
From your description here, it sounds like we’re arguing essentially the same thing, but you think it’s different? How?
I think my argument is more stark: I’m saying that there are fundamentally two types of credence, (A) and (B) in the comment above, and only one of them is relevant to rational decision-making.
I agree with intuition being the thing that separates Halfers and Thirders, but I’m saying that they’re fighting over irrelevant Type (B) credence—“inner” credence in the OOBR post I linked to.
“And only one of them is relevant to rational decision-making”—okay, that’s a significant difference!