Why is there is no space where can I dance with strangers in public for free without prior preperation or an exceptional value proposition to prospective partners (e.g. I’ll pay you to dance with me, or you get to look at my handsome self—hint: I’m not super handsome). Or is there, and I’m not aware of it? In a foreign country, perhaps?
Which life insurer do you use? Anyone know if Commonwealth bank or uni super will payout for cryonics?
Recently I’ve been toying with the notion of political determinism. I’d be interested in a text analysis program that could analyse new legislation (this exists already) brought before parliament and predict (this doesn’t exist yet) the political feasability based on content and contextual factors. Any suggestions? Given I have access to the text mining software that can classify legislation, can I propose a kaggle competition to predict responses to it? Right now political feasability analysis is pretty crude and requires human specialists not instead, policies could one day be generated based on plausibility then simply selected by human supervisors in parliament.
What is the relationship between housing characteristics and the elements of flourishing?
Science PhD’s are frequently derided for being in vast oversupply to demand, resulting in poor employment outcomes for those who go for them. How do management and marketing PhD’s compare as a career capital aquisition strategy? Hearsay suggets busines PhD’s are far more valuable and there is high demand for business academics. However, my research suggests this may be explained by higher barriers to entry to business PhD’s than science PhD’s. Regarding management professional doctorates:
As a rule, students had 15 years of professional experience and were 40 years old. Two out of three were male and the students were from all sorts of industries – such as financial services, consulting firms, or IT and telecommunication – or ran their own businesses. Most of the students worked full-time, mainly in senior and middle management.
It seems like all studies between charitable giving and happiness are correlational and don’t draw causal inferences, but journalists and charities frequently do. Is there any reason to believe that people who give more on aggregate have higher incomes, facilitating happier lives more generally?
Based on political affiliation, some studies argue conservatives, on average, are happier than liberals. A potential explanation is greater acceptance of income inequalities in society leads to a less worried nature.
In fact, if I was to design a study from which to draw a cauasal inference, my hypothesise would test to see if becoming interested in donating harmed the donor.
Effective altruism without justice considerations should suffer from the same problems as non-reciprocal altruism in nature.
Moralistic aggression. A protection mechanism from cheaters acts to regulate the advantage of cheaters in selection against altruists. The moralistic altruist may want to educate or even punish a cheater.
-wiki. How can they protect against that if at all?
Partnerships. Altruism to create friendships.
EA’s don’t try to improve the wellbeing of their own group directly generally so they’re reducing their own fitness. In nature, altruistic cabals form and split away from the less altruistic groups, and if altruism is an effective strategy for their adaptiveness then that altruistic community thrives.
What is the relationship between porn consumption and health outcomes? Are there any systematic reviews of the relationship between porn and health outcomes (including mental health outcomes)?
interesting research
Public interest alert. MIRI take note. I met a girl the other day who’s researching reasoning about Goal Revelation in Human Negotiation. Specifically, she’s working on training AI’s to out-negotiate humans in psychological games. The implications for the AI box experiment are clear and terrifying. She seems unaware of the implications, and the field doesn’t have a strong web-presence at my institute—but Harvard seems to be the powerhouse for papers in the subfield right now.
Can’t concentrate for long? In Volitional modulation of autonomic arousal improves sustained attention the case is made that their autonomic arousal biofeedback protocol can increase sustained attention in neuropsychiatrically impaired populations. It probably applies to nonclinical populations too if you’re looking for a cognitive superpower.
This research examines the influence of power on consumer decision strategies. It proposes that high power directs consumers’ attention to options’ positive features, making choosing a more preferred strategy than rejecting, whereas low power shifts consumers’ focus to negative features, making rejecting a more preferred strategy than choosing. Two studies using different manipulations of power provide consistent support for this effect. The results also indicate that consumers in a state of high power are more satisfied with their choices when they adopt a choosing strategy than when they adopt a rejecting strategy, whereas the opposite is true for consumers in a state of low power. In addition, study 2 shows that the previous effects are reduced when consumers’ sense of responsibility is made salient.
A main assumption behind privatisations, public-private partnerships and private finance initiatives in major programme delivery is that the involvement of private risk capital in programme delivery, for instance in infrastructure provision, will bring much-needed discipline to the planning and delivery of programmes.
The research in this project is designed to test this assumption. So far the assumption has been tested only with small samples of programmes and the evidence is mixed. Statistically valid conclusions do not exist. This study will attempt to change this state of affairs.
Ariely argues that aversion to loss rather than a desire for flexibility explains the paradox of choice. That is, DON’T KEEP YOUR OPTIONS OPEN, RISK AND ITERATE INSTEAD as a maxim might be prudent in a broad class of circumstances while people get use to this paradigm, it’s astrategic.
asking individuals to think about “how much time they would like to donate” (vs. “how much money they would like to donate”) to a charity increases the amount that they ultimately donate to the charity.
A/PROF ANISH NAGPAL, former mechanical engineer, former economist and present day marketing professor. Wow.
end the objectification of children and infants for the cuteness, they are not objects and deserve respect and self determination and rights not trivialisation and paternalism
Why is there is no space where can I dance with strangers in public for free without prior preperation or an exceptional value proposition to prospective partners (e.g. I’ll pay you to dance with me, or you get to look at my handsome self—hint: I’m not super handsome). Or is there, and I’m not aware of it? In a foreign country, perhaps?
Dancing in the streets used to be a thing and still is an many cultures. Seems it got lost in industrialization. Christopher Alexander proposes to use more of this and provide suitable spaces for it (which also got lost though it’s unclear what is cause and what effect). The book is hard to get but luckily there is Google Books:
You’re in luck! I found some copies available on this incredibly obscure website called Amazon.
(de, uk,
fr, jp. The French one appears not to be available from Amazon itself but only from their marketplace sellers; the others are all from Amazon itself.)
OK I agree. The English original probably is OK to get. The very good German translation is almost impossible to get. With some patience I got one for more than 100 EUR.
Why is there is no space where can I dance with strangers in public for free without prior preperation or an exceptional value proposition to prospective partners (e.g. I’ll pay you to dance with me, or you get to look at my handsome self—hint: I’m not super handsome). Or is there, and I’m not aware of it? In a foreign country, perhaps?
There are certainly events in Berlin that fit more or less into that category. However often the people who organize an event want to make money with it. Renting rooms costs money.
Dancing with strangers who can’t dance (i.e. haven’t send time in prior preparation to aquire dancing skills) isn’t optimal. In general if you want to dance with strangers it makes a lot of sense to learn dancing.
EA’s don’t try to improve the wellbeing of their own group directly generally so they’re reducing their own fitness. In nature, altruistic cabals form and split away from the less altruistic groups, and if altruism is an effective strategy for their adaptiveness then that altruistic community thrives.
That could be related to EA being a lot about signalling.Spending is a high value signal. Of course in principle it reduces your fitness in the long term. But being a costly signal is the whole point of signalling. So it keeps the size of the EA population small—which could be seen as the selection against altruism effect mentioned—but intended from a signalling point of view.
What is the relationship between housing characteristics and the elements of flourishing?
That is the topic of Christopher Alexander’s series of books on architecture and the patterns behind it.
The book I got the most of was A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction which contains lots and lots of architectural patterns large and small for humane living. It is somewhat dated in the examples but less so in the patterns themselves. I recommend against “A timeless way of building” which is more philosophical and less grounded in empirical facts (many of which are given for many patterns in the former).
I have applied some of the patterns in my own house to good measure.
Other things that come to mind: being able to walk to places, lack of little things that take more mental energy than they should (on street alternate parking is one of those for me).
Your housing should make it easy and enjoyable to do things you value. Live near a gym or a beautiful park if you want to exercise more. Make sure the kitchen is decent if you want to eat out less. I know that socializing is good for me, but I’m bad about making plans and starting conversations. So I live with introverted, nerdy roommates (the sort of people I get along with best), and I’m trying to move to a nearby neighborhood where people hang out and talk outdoors a lot.
Your housing should not make you stressed about money. For most people, it’s their largest budget category, and not very flexible. The common wisdom is that housing plus debt payments should be less than 1⁄3 of your income (with possible exceptions if you rent in an expensive city). If you can go lower than this without sacrificing too much, I’d say do it—having extra cash is better for human thriving than fancy housing. (Possible ways to turn cash into thriving: travel, take unpaid vacation or time between jobs to work on a side project, visit far away friends, be able to walk away from a job or living situation that becomes terrible without lack of money stopping you.)
What is the relationship between housing characteristics and elements of flourishing?
what? say again?
DON’T KEEP YOUR OPTIONS OPEN, RISK AND ITERATE INSTEAD
I suspect this advice works for some people some of the time; but might be the opposite advice that other people need. As such it is unhelpful in the wrong circumstances.
children and infants… self determination
Children really don’t have self-determination. That’s why we play such games about them and to help them move forward. Also when thinking of a “simple mind” a good example would be a child. I have no problem with that. Cute factor is another matter; and there are probably evolutionary reasons why we find kids and young creatures cute.
For instance, givedirectly helps materialists more than non materialists but materialists are unhappier than materialsts particularly among the poor. Is that evidence against the effectiveness of givedirectly? That’s up for debate, but I could have picked just about any example.
DON’T KEEP YOUR OPTIONS OPEN, RISK AND ITERATE INSTEAD
I suspect this advice works for some people some of the time;
suspicion
Perhaps it’s worth understanding—do I fit into the category of “keeping too many options open (and have gotten burned)” or do I fit into the category of “have been trying risk-iterate for a while (and have gotten burned)” before considering the advice and how it might apply.
Containment thread
Requests for information
Why is there is no space where can I dance with strangers in public for free without prior preperation or an exceptional value proposition to prospective partners (e.g. I’ll pay you to dance with me, or you get to look at my handsome self—hint: I’m not super handsome). Or is there, and I’m not aware of it? In a foreign country, perhaps?
Which life insurer do you use? Anyone know if Commonwealth bank or uni super will payout for cryonics?
Recently I’ve been toying with the notion of political determinism. I’d be interested in a text analysis program that could analyse new legislation (this exists already) brought before parliament and predict (this doesn’t exist yet) the political feasability based on content and contextual factors. Any suggestions? Given I have access to the text mining software that can classify legislation, can I propose a kaggle competition to predict responses to it? Right now political feasability analysis is pretty crude and requires human specialists not instead, policies could one day be generated based on plausibility then simply selected by human supervisors in parliament.
What is the relationship between housing characteristics and the elements of flourishing?
Science PhD’s are frequently derided for being in vast oversupply to demand, resulting in poor employment outcomes for those who go for them. How do management and marketing PhD’s compare as a career capital aquisition strategy? Hearsay suggets busines PhD’s are far more valuable and there is high demand for business academics. However, my research suggests this may be explained by higher barriers to entry to business PhD’s than science PhD’s. Regarding management professional doctorates:
However, professional doctorates are a step higher than traditional PhDs. www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20140507145246893. The fact that Oxford publishes a list of its unemployed PhD students from its last graduates is slightly telling of the markets disequilibrium. Take into account their already small intake and the high barriers to entry (Oxford Said GMAT simulator). The case for the marketing PhD is simpler. There is disequilbrium between supply and demand, but also mismatch between marketing PhD graduate characteristics and marketing job requirements so marketing PhD’s are neccersarily even that geared towards academia. My tentative conclusion is that marketing and management PhD’s are fraught endeavours justlike science PhD’s (both being more job worthy than arts PhD’s) in general.
It seems like all studies between charitable giving and happiness are correlational and don’t draw causal inferences, but journalists and charities frequently do. Is there any reason to believe that people who give more on aggregate have higher incomes, facilitating happier lives more generally?
-wiki
In fact, if I was to design a study from which to draw a cauasal inference, my hypothesise would test to see if becoming interested in donating harmed the donor.
Effective altruism without justice considerations should suffer from the same problems as non-reciprocal altruism in nature.
-wiki. How can they protect against that if at all?
EA’s don’t try to improve the wellbeing of their own group directly generally so they’re reducing their own fitness. In nature, altruistic cabals form and split away from the less altruistic groups, and if altruism is an effective strategy for their adaptiveness then that altruistic community thrives.
What is the relationship between porn consumption and health outcomes? Are there any systematic reviews of the relationship between porn and health outcomes (including mental health outcomes)?
interesting research
Public interest alert. MIRI take note. I met a girl the other day who’s researching reasoning about Goal Revelation in Human Negotiation. Specifically, she’s working on training AI’s to out-negotiate humans in psychological games. The implications for the AI box experiment are clear and terrifying. She seems unaware of the implications, and the field doesn’t have a strong web-presence at my institute—but Harvard seems to be the powerhouse for papers in the subfield right now.
The One Weird Trait That Predicts Whether You’re a Trump Supporter
autobiographical episodic memory cueing the remedial equivelant to reference class forecasting
In Meditation and attention: A comparison of the effects of concentrative and mindfulness meditation on sustained attention the case is made that long term meditators can sustain their concentration longer than short term meditators, and that mindfulness meditators deal between with unexpected tasks of attention than concentrative meditators, but no differences otherwise.
Can’t concentrate for long? In Volitional modulation of autonomic arousal improves sustained attention the case is made that their autonomic arousal biofeedback protocol can increase sustained attention in neuropsychiatrically impaired populations. It probably applies to nonclinical populations too if you’re looking for a cognitive superpower.
Private versus public finance in major programme management
-The powerful select, the powerless reject: Power’s influence in decision strategies—empirical support for the ‘abundance mentality’ theory of personal development
Ariely argues that aversion to loss rather than a desire for flexibility explains the paradox of choice. That is, DON’T KEEP YOUR OPTIONS OPEN, RISK AND ITERATE INSTEAD as a maxim might be prudent in a broad class of circumstances while people get use to this paradigm, it’s astrategic.
-Liu and Aaker
opinion
A/PROF ANISH NAGPAL, former mechanical engineer, former economist and present day marketing professor. Wow.
end the objectification of children and infants for the cuteness, they are not objects and deserve respect and self determination and rights not trivialisation and paternalism
media
Author Robert Greene on the Utility of Weirdness, Fear, and Pain—Inside Quest—a very good video just like many on Inside quest
Dancing in the streets used to be a thing and still is an many cultures. Seems it got lost in industrialization. Christopher Alexander proposes to use more of this and provide suitable spaces for it (which also got lost though it’s unclear what is cause and what effect). The book is hard to get but luckily there is Google Books:
A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction—section on dancing in the streets
You’re in luck! I found some copies available on this incredibly obscure website called Amazon.
(de, uk, fr, jp. The French one appears not to be available from Amazon itself but only from their marketplace sellers; the others are all from Amazon itself.)
OK I agree. The English original probably is OK to get. The very good German translation is almost impossible to get. With some patience I got one for more than 100 EUR.
Given that the orginal is in English, why read a translation?
Apart from that the English version seems to be available on the website network that recently got a lot of press attention.
Don’t tell me. I tried to get it for my less anglophile friends and family.
There are certainly events in Berlin that fit more or less into that category. However often the people who organize an event want to make money with it. Renting rooms costs money.
Dancing with strangers who can’t dance (i.e. haven’t send time in prior preparation to aquire dancing skills) isn’t optimal. In general if you want to dance with strangers it makes a lot of sense to learn dancing.
That could be related to EA being a lot about signalling.Spending is a high value signal. Of course in principle it reduces your fitness in the long term. But being a costly signal is the whole point of signalling. So it keeps the size of the EA population small—which could be seen as the selection against altruism effect mentioned—but intended from a signalling point of view.
That is the topic of Christopher Alexander’s series of books on architecture and the patterns behind it.
The book I got the most of was A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction which contains lots and lots of architectural patterns large and small for humane living. It is somewhat dated in the examples but less so in the patterns themselves. I recommend against “A timeless way of building” which is more philosophical and less grounded in empirical facts (many of which are given for many patterns in the former).
I have applied some of the patterns in my own house to good measure.
http://lesswrong.com/lw/7am/rational_home_buying/ Does this help?
Other things that come to mind: being able to walk to places, lack of little things that take more mental energy than they should (on street alternate parking is one of those for me).
Your housing should make it easy and enjoyable to do things you value. Live near a gym or a beautiful park if you want to exercise more. Make sure the kitchen is decent if you want to eat out less. I know that socializing is good for me, but I’m bad about making plans and starting conversations. So I live with introverted, nerdy roommates (the sort of people I get along with best), and I’m trying to move to a nearby neighborhood where people hang out and talk outdoors a lot.
Your housing should not make you stressed about money. For most people, it’s their largest budget category, and not very flexible. The common wisdom is that housing plus debt payments should be less than 1⁄3 of your income (with possible exceptions if you rent in an expensive city). If you can go lower than this without sacrificing too much, I’d say do it—having extra cash is better for human thriving than fancy housing. (Possible ways to turn cash into thriving: travel, take unpaid vacation or time between jobs to work on a side project, visit far away friends, be able to walk away from a job or living situation that becomes terrible without lack of money stopping you.)
what? say again?
I suspect this advice works for some people some of the time; but might be the opposite advice that other people need. As such it is unhelpful in the wrong circumstances.
Children really don’t have self-determination. That’s why we play such games about them and to help them move forward. Also when thinking of a “simple mind” a good example would be a child. I have no problem with that. Cute factor is another matter; and there are probably evolutionary reasons why we find kids and young creatures cute.
Your suspicion is true of any non axiom.
For instance, givedirectly helps materialists more than non materialists but materialists are unhappier than materialsts particularly among the poor. Is that evidence against the effectiveness of givedirectly? That’s up for debate, but I could have picked just about any example.
Perhaps it’s worth understanding—do I fit into the category of “keeping too many options open (and have gotten burned)” or do I fit into the category of “have been trying risk-iterate for a while (and have gotten burned)” before considering the advice and how it might apply.