Instead of naming only one piece of evidence that LW has a belief in natural rights, it would have been more, well, Bayesian to list multiple lines of evidence that LW has a belief in natural rights and then built up your argument from those multiple bits of evidence.
It was probably very unsafe to premise your entire argument on just the non-binding deletion policies.
Instead of naming only one piece of evidence that LW has a belief in natural rights, it would have been more, well, Bayesian to list multiple lines of evidence that LW has a belief in natural rights and then built up your argument from those multiple bits of evidence.
It was probably very unsafe to premise your entire argument on just the non-binding deletion policies.