See how pointless it is to just broadcast poorly-explained and poorly-understood ideas?
Slightly clumsy but the point came across nonetheless. The last sentence is the interesting one:
It seems like what matters here are possible explanations for weaker agent being a certain way, and it’s these (potentially more powerful) explanations that play the game with stronger opponents in your stead (so you engage whoever wrote “Defect” of that piece of paper, Transparent Newcomb-style).
The earlier sentences seem to be making a simple concept more complicated than it needs to be. Control just isn’t that deep when you reduce it.
Slightly clumsy but the point came across nonetheless. The last sentence is the interesting one:
The earlier sentences seem to be making a simple concept more complicated than it needs to be. Control just isn’t that deep when you reduce it.
Which sentences, how simple should it be?
I’m still trying to figure it out.