The “scale of intelligence” pic still looks bad (as in suspicious).
I disagree. It quickly gets across the basic point in a way that doesn’t imply too much more than is intended. People are used to qualitatively interpreting qualitative diagrams. I don’t think people will read more into this one.
I’m more concerned about the “dubious ambiguous assertions not accompanied by arguments” vibe.
My critique was here. The diagram is counter-intuitive—and not in a good way.
The “scale of intelligence” pic still looks bad (as in suspicious).
I disagree. It quickly gets across the basic point in a way that doesn’t imply too much more than is intended. People are used to qualitatively interpreting qualitative diagrams. I don’t think people will read more into this one.
I’m more concerned about the “dubious ambiguous assertions not accompanied by arguments” vibe.
My critique was here. The diagram is counter-intuitive—and not in a good way.