I conjecture that we’re supposed to read it under the classical definition of “philosophy”, which used to include pretty much every type of intellectual discussion, including such practical issues as how to properly raise children, how to organise a political society, etc.
There is a great ted lecture on this subject. I thought he did a good job at addressing the concerns. At least to the point of defending that research should continue to at least allow future generations to decide if they think it is acceptable.
What are the Serious Philosophical Issues posed by life extension?
I can see many serious practical issues, but in what way should philosophical opinions change due to the mere extension of human life span?
I conjecture that we’re supposed to read it under the classical definition of “philosophy”, which used to include pretty much every type of intellectual discussion, including such practical issues as how to properly raise children, how to organise a political society, etc.
“Who wants to live forever when love must die?”
There is a great ted lecture on this subject. I thought he did a good job at addressing the concerns. At least to the point of defending that research should continue to at least allow future generations to decide if they think it is acceptable.
http://www.ted.com/talks/aubrey_de_grey_says_we_can_avoid_aging.html
I don’t know.
What is a day for?