No, the point of that section is that there are many AI designs in which we can’t explicitly make goals.
I know, but you use the word “predict”, which is what I was pointing out.
I disagree. A textbook error in machine learning that has not yet been solved is good match for a fundamental problem.
What do you mean, “has not yet been solved”? This kind of error is routinely being solved in practice, which is why it’s a textbook example.
Again, I’m not claiming that these aren’t also problems elsewhere.
Yes, but that makes it a bad illustration.
Why? I’ve already varied the wording
Because it’s bad prose, it sounds unnatural (YMMV).
Hence, the link, for people who don’t know.
This doesn’t address my argument. I know there is a link and I know that people could click on it, so that’s not what I meant.
(More later, maybe.)
I know, but you use the word “predict”, which is what I was pointing out.
What do you mean, “has not yet been solved”? This kind of error is routinely being solved in practice, which is why it’s a textbook example.
Yes, but that makes it a bad illustration.
Because it’s bad prose, it sounds unnatural (YMMV).
This doesn’t address my argument. I know there is a link and I know that people could click on it, so that’s not what I meant.
(More later, maybe.)