The problem is that, at some level, pure Boltzmann brains become more probable than quantum abiogenesis. That is, if abiogenesis is very improbable, than appearing of the whole conscious mind from the ocean full of amino acids become more probable, and such mind unlikely will observe the whole evolutionary history.
However, as we observe abiogenesis, it means that this event is more probable than Boltzmann brain formation, and such probabilities could be calculated. Some cosmologists did it.
It seems weird that given our laws of nature it would be more probable that boltzmann brains would form because boltzmann brains are more complicated than rna as far as I could tell
I thought the whole problem with boltzmann brains was in the fine tuning argument and the multiverse
The problem is that, at some level, pure Boltzmann brains become more probable than quantum abiogenesis. That is, if abiogenesis is very improbable, than appearing of the whole conscious mind from the ocean full of amino acids become more probable, and such mind unlikely will observe the whole evolutionary history.
However, as we observe abiogenesis, it means that this event is more probable than Boltzmann brain formation, and such probabilities could be calculated. Some cosmologists did it.
It seems weird that given our laws of nature it would be more probable that boltzmann brains would form because boltzmann brains are more complicated than rna as far as I could tell
I thought the whole problem with boltzmann brains was in the fine tuning argument and the multiverse
Could you also link me to a good explanation of the odds of boltzmann brains
Thank you
thanks for the reply
Can you please link me to these cosmologists
Start here reading articles by Page, Carroll, Smolin, Linde, Bostrom.
while i have not read the link you sent and I plan on
They all seem to be referring to the fine tuning argument vs abiogenesis
thanks