But, on the other hand, there is the advantage that if you spin it as a grave, then when the cryonics company goes bust, the law protects the patient (to some extent) from being disturbed. For example, creditors can’t dismantle it for scrap if it’s a grave, but if it’s an Alcor/CI asset, then they can.
Rather like patently atheistic cryonicists having to say that they have a “religious” objection to autopsy.
But, on the other hand, there is the advantage that if you spin it as a grave, then when the cryonics company goes bust, the law protects the patient (to some extent) from being disturbed. For example, creditors can’t dismantle it for scrap if it’s a grave, but if it’s an Alcor/CI asset, then they can.
Rather like patently atheistic cryonicists having to say that they have a “religious” objection to autopsy.
“cryonics” → “autopsy”, I assume