That being the normative math, why does the human world’s enduringly dominant discourse algorithm take for granted the ubiquity of, not just disagreements, but predictable disagreements?
Well, the paper says disagreement is only unpredictable between agents with the same priors, so seems like that explains at least part of this?
Well, the paper says disagreement is only unpredictable between agents with the same priors, so seems like that explains at least part of this?