Ah. When I think camp grounds I think… camp grounds for camping trips. Which isn’t dangerous at all, but also isn’t essential.
So camp grounds are de facto semi-permanent housing, or collectively serve that function because people rotate between them?
If that’s true, and there’s no alternative, then it would make sense to let people already there remain, and if that requires keeping them open, so be it. I don’t think it changes the larger argument.
Of course, the correct answer is actually more like “we don’t have to think about this as essential because it’s safe so there’s no reason to shut it down” and calling it essential is being perverse at least once and potentially twice because of that.
Of course, the correct answer is actually more like “we don’t have to think about this as essential because it’s safe so there’s no reason to shut it down” and calling it essential is being perverse at least once and potentially twice because of that.
Ah. When I think camp grounds I think… camp grounds for camping trips. Which isn’t dangerous at all, but also isn’t essential.
So camp grounds are de facto semi-permanent housing, or collectively serve that function because people rotate between them?
If that’s true, and there’s no alternative, then it would make sense to let people already there remain, and if that requires keeping them open, so be it. I don’t think it changes the larger argument.
Of course, the correct answer is actually more like “we don’t have to think about this as essential because it’s safe so there’s no reason to shut it down” and calling it essential is being perverse at least once and potentially twice because of that.
No argument there!