wedrifid comments on Sudden Future Singularity (SFS) as soon as 8.7 million years in the future?

wedrifid 11 Mar 2012 21:05 UTC
−10 points

Downvoted because of a nice progression −4 ⇒ −3 ⇒ −2 ⇒ −1 ⇒ 0 (this!)

Voted away from 0 (currently downvoted) because I object to people downvoting me to make pretty patterns and so have a preference for their pattern preference at my expense not being satisfied.

Also: commented because if gRR does manage somehow to enforce his pattern preference it will ensure that I will be upvoted.
- gRR 11 Mar 2012 21:09 UTC
  0 points
  Parent
  Upvoted to keep the justice and the pattern. (Will remove this soon)
- Vladimir_Nesov 11 Mar 2012 22:07 UTC
  −5 points
  Parent
  
  Also: commented because if gRR does manage somehow to enforce his pattern preference it will ensure that I will be upvoted.
  
  No luck, the pattern’s shifted: it is currently −6 ⇒ −5 ⇒ −4 ⇒ −3 ⇒ −2 ⇒ −1 (parent) ⇒ 0 (this!)
  What links here?
  - Vladimir_Nesov's comment on Sudden Future Singularity (SFS) as soon as 8.7 million years in the future? by MichaelAnissimov (11 Mar 2012 22:07 UTC; -5 points)
  - wedrifid 12 Mar 2012 5:29 UTC
    −5 points
    Parent
    
    No luck, the pattern’s shifted: it is currently −6 ⇒ −5 ⇒ −4 ⇒ −3 ⇒ −2 ⇒ −1 (parent) ⇒ 0 (this!)
    
    Sounds good. I really didn’t like the comment which you place at −6!