Is the Massachusetts number due to the huge amount of testing MIT is doing? MIT alone is responsible for 10% of the state’s tests, and they’ve got low positive rates (7 positive tests this week out of about 10,000 tests). https://news.mit.edu/2020/covid-testing-reopening-0824
Or the number of positive tests was literally negative? I agree that seems impossible unless they somehow overcounted before and were correcting for it
Is the Massachusetts number due to the huge amount of testing MIT is doing? MIT alone is responsible for 10% of the state’s tests, and they’ve got low positive rates (7 positive tests this week out of about 10,000 tests). https://news.mit.edu/2020/covid-testing-reopening-0824
Or the number of positive tests was literally negative? I agree that seems impossible unless they somehow overcounted before and were correcting for it
Literally negative. Which means it was some sort of correction, and shouldn’t be treated as a real effect, because it can’t be.