But I missed your point in the previous response. The idea of disagreement about decisions in the same sense as usual disagreement about anticipation caused by errors/​uncertainty is interesting. This is not bargaining about outcome, for the object under consideration is agents’ belief, not the fact the belief is about. The agents could work on correct belief about a fact even in the absence of reliable access to the fact itself, reaching agreement.
But I missed your point in the previous response. The idea of disagreement about decisions in the same sense as usual disagreement about anticipation caused by errors/​uncertainty is interesting. This is not bargaining about outcome, for the object under consideration is agents’ belief, not the fact the belief is about. The agents could work on correct belief about a fact even in the absence of reliable access to the fact itself, reaching agreement.