That’s a bit of a long read, and both your endorsement and the title seem too strong to be believable. If a few more people endorse that it’s worth reading, I’ll give it a go!
There is a weaker and maybe shorter version by Chalmers: https://consc.net/papers/panpsychism.pdf. The short version is that there is no way for you to non-accidently know about quantization state of your brain and for that quantization not be a part of an easy problem: pretty much by definition, if you can just physically measure it, it’s easy and not mysterious.
That’s a bit of a long read, and both your endorsement and the title seem too strong to be believable. If a few more people endorse that it’s worth reading, I’ll give it a go!
There is a weaker and maybe shorter version by Chalmers: https://consc.net/papers/panpsychism.pdf. The short version is that there is no way for you to non-accidently know about quantization state of your brain and for that quantization not be a part of an easy problem: pretty much by definition, if you can just physically measure it, it’s easy and not mysterious.