Panpsychism is correct about genuineness and subjectivity of experiences, but you can quantize your caring about other differences between experiences of human and zygote however you want.
That’s a bit of a long read, and both your endorsement and the title seem too strong to be believable. If a few more people endorse that it’s worth reading, I’ll give it a go!
There is a weaker and maybe shorter version by Chalmers: https://consc.net/papers/panpsychism.pdf. The short version is that there is no way for you to non-accidently know about quantization state of your brain and for that quantization not be a part of an easy problem: pretty much by definition, if you can just physically measure it, it’s easy and not mysterious.
Panpsychism is correct about genuineness and subjectivity of experiences, but you can quantize your caring about other differences between experiences of human and zygote however you want.
That’s a bit of a long read, and both your endorsement and the title seem too strong to be believable. If a few more people endorse that it’s worth reading, I’ll give it a go!
There is a weaker and maybe shorter version by Chalmers: https://consc.net/papers/panpsychism.pdf. The short version is that there is no way for you to non-accidently know about quantization state of your brain and for that quantization not be a part of an easy problem: pretty much by definition, if you can just physically measure it, it’s easy and not mysterious.