Upvoted even though I only made it to the part about MWI dogmatism.
Do look at the last two paragraphs...
I did, but I can make neither head nor tail of them.
That was my point.
Then I still don’t get your point.
(Edited) The point is that the value of the post may seem very different if you take more than its opening into account.
Then presumably you have your own downvote to apply; need you also require mine?
(I’m sorry; I’ve reformulated the grandparent.)
They didn’t make sense last time either. To be generous, there appears to be considerable inferential distance to cover.
Upvoted even though I only made it to the part about MWI dogmatism.
Do look at the last two paragraphs...
I did, but I can make neither head nor tail of them.
That was my point.
Then I still don’t get your point.
(Edited) The point is that the value of the post may seem very different if you take more than its opening into account.
Then presumably you have your own downvote to apply; need you also require mine?
(I’m sorry; I’ve reformulated the grandparent.)
They didn’t make sense last time either. To be generous, there appears to be considerable inferential distance to cover.