About 50 years looks simply implausible. It was rumored that the dissemination of false information in wartime would be prosecuted under the article on treason, which can be given a maximum of 20 years, and which is actually written in such a way that it can be interpreted very broadly, but based on this, even if you add others article for false information, then the maximum will be one and a half terms for the worst crime, that is, 30 years, not 50.
I am very confused. I just looked into the vote history of this comment, and I can’t find any point in time where this comment was in the negatives. Can someone explain to me?
About 50 years looks simply implausible. It was rumored that the dissemination of false information in wartime would be prosecuted under the article on treason, which can be given a maximum of 20 years, and which is actually written in such a way that it can be interpreted very broadly, but based on this, even if you add others article for false information, then the maximum will be one and a half terms for the worst crime, that is, 30 years, not 50.
Your English is fine, and your comment seems informed and relevant. Unfortunately, upvoting and downvoting are not objective here.
I am very confused. I just looked into the vote history of this comment, and I can’t find any point in time where this comment was in the negatives. Can someone explain to me?
It was on zero.