I am not quite so daft as that—I’m genuinely glad you enjoyed the story (presuming you did) and have no negative opinion of you or anyone who chooses to disagree with me on a matter of this kind. I found it as preposterous and heavy-handed as a Chick tract, and did not like it for that reason.
Honestly, I thought it was worthwhile just for the Pascal’s Pyramid Scheme joke; most of the text is extraneous to that main joke, which is clever and funny.
No, you were perfectly justified—I dithered quite a bit about posting it that way precisely because it is such an arrogant way to express my personal opinion.
What does this have to do with rationality?
The epilogue explains it. Maybe the best way to fight religion is with meta-religion.
God forbid something is entertaining
That would have been nice. This is more along the lines of “ha, ha, religion is stupid”.
Who gets to be the arbiter of humor? It’s an individual interpretation, not a proclamation to be made by one for all.
I am not quite so daft as that—I’m genuinely glad you enjoyed the story (presuming you did) and have no negative opinion of you or anyone who chooses to disagree with me on a matter of this kind. I found it as preposterous and heavy-handed as a Chick tract, and did not like it for that reason.
But Chick tracts are so entertainingly awful!
Will you think less of me if I say I didn’t like Catch-22 either? (:
Honestly, I thought it was worthwhile just for the Pascal’s Pyramid Scheme joke; most of the text is extraneous to that main joke, which is clever and funny.
I can understand that, but I couldn’t get past the surface.
Right on. I was maybe a little over sensitive about your style of opinion.
No, you were perfectly justified—I dithered quite a bit about posting it that way precisely because it is such an arrogant way to express my personal opinion.