That’s what I would do if I were to review my own sequence, especially given that the post-2019 articles happen to all be part of a subsequence that’s somewhat distinct from all the preceding content.
That answer my specific question then. And in general it makes sense to do it. Thanks.
That’s what I would do if I were to review my own sequence, especially given that the post-2019 articles happen to all be part of a subsequence that’s somewhat distinct from all the preceding content.
That answer my specific question then. And in general it makes sense to do it. Thanks.