But I cannot, on the fly, think of crazy-but-who-knows things of today (well, except for the Search for Ancestors of Angiosperms, it just goes on).
If we look at the future of humanity there might be “The Long Now”, “The Age of Em”, “AGI goes FOOM” and a bunch of other hypothesis.
More generally Anglo-culture prefer Democrats against Republicans and Whigs and Tories. As such it often tries to put a conflict as a competition of two alternatives. A lot of the mechanism of science like the students t.test also is build on the foundation that you make decisions between two alternatives.
Continental philosophy doesn’t tend to do that to the same extend but continental philosophy also doesn’t have much influence on the natural sciences.
If we look at the future of humanity there might be “The Long Now”, “The Age of Em”, “AGI goes FOOM” and a bunch of other hypothesis.
More generally Anglo-culture prefer Democrats against Republicans and Whigs and Tories. As such it often tries to put a conflict as a competition of two alternatives. A lot of the mechanism of science like the students t.test also is build on the foundation that you make decisions between two alternatives. Continental philosophy doesn’t tend to do that to the same extend but continental philosophy also doesn’t have much influence on the natural sciences.