You don’t know whether or not AI is aligned when it takes over decision-making.
AI overtakes by being able to make better decisions. If an AI CEO can make better decisions than the human CEO, a company benefits from letting the AI CEO make the decisions.
Imagine that you have a secretive hedge fund that’s run by an AI. It buys up companies, and votes for moving more and more decision-making of the companies it buys to be AI-based. Then the decisions at the companies become much better and their stock market price rise.
Do you think that some lawmaker will step up and try to pass a law that stops the increased economic competitiveness of those companies?
If you can’t get a moratorium and air strikes today, why do you think you would get it when AI provided much more economic benefits and becomes more important for the economy to function.
I agree that advance AI will find the ways to ascend without triggering (dangerous to it) airstrikes.
It also means that it will look like cooperating with humans until it has deseasive strategic advantage. Thus its robotic infrastructure has to look peaceful, maybe effective manufacturing robots for factories, like Optimus.
Today, when the police check someone’s ID and the system tells them that there’s an arrest warrant for the person, they just arrest the person because the computer tells them to do so. There’s no need for any robots to make the arrest.
Yes, AI can rule without killing humans but just paying them for tasks. But given recent discussion that AI will kill everyone, I assume here that AI actually is going to do this and look at how it can happen.
You don’t know whether or not AI is aligned when it takes over decision-making.
AI overtakes by being able to make better decisions. If an AI CEO can make better decisions than the human CEO, a company benefits from letting the AI CEO make the decisions.
Imagine that you have a secretive hedge fund that’s run by an AI. It buys up companies, and votes for moving more and more decision-making of the companies it buys to be AI-based. Then the decisions at the companies become much better and their stock market price rise.
Do you think that some lawmaker will step up and try to pass a law that stops the increased economic competitiveness of those companies?
If you can’t get a moratorium and air strikes today, why do you think you would get it when AI provided much more economic benefits and becomes more important for the economy to function.
I agree that advance AI will find the ways to ascend without triggering (dangerous to it) airstrikes.
It also means that it will look like cooperating with humans until it has deseasive strategic advantage. Thus its robotic infrastructure has to look peaceful, maybe effective manufacturing robots for factories, like Optimus.
Today, when the police check someone’s ID and the system tells them that there’s an arrest warrant for the person, they just arrest the person because the computer tells them to do so. There’s no need for any robots to make the arrest.
Most humans who have a job do what they are told.
Yes, AI can rule without killing humans but just paying them for tasks. But given recent discussion that AI will kill everyone, I assume here that AI actually is going to do this and look at how it can happen.