Thats not what mathematical realism is supposed that mean. If non contradict is the criterion of mathematical truth, MR suggests that every non contradictory entity exists somewhere , but doesn’t require it to exist everywhere … or need your input. So if it’s non contradictory to eat an enchilada, one of your counterparts already is …but there was is no reason for you to be, since not eating an enchilada is also non contradictory.
But that’s still not how MR works: existence is the criterion of truth, not truth of existence. If it’s not in Plato’s heaven, it’s not true even if it’s non contradictory.
Thats not what mathematical realism is supposed that mean. If non contradict is the criterion of mathematical truth, MR suggests that every non contradictory entity exists somewhere , but doesn’t require it to exist everywhere … or need your input. So if it’s non contradictory to eat an enchilada, one of your counterparts already is …but there was is no reason for you to be, since not eating an enchilada is also non contradictory.
But that’s still not how MR works: existence is the criterion of truth, not truth of existence. If it’s not in Plato’s heaven, it’s not true even if it’s non contradictory.
Changing the title to “pseudo mathematical realism bad?”