In what sense do they not have creators, and in what sense are they simulations?
Note that this kind of argument https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/MmmPyJicaaJRk4Eg2/the-limit-of-language-models
...doesn’t show that LLMs are simulations in the sense of containing sentient beings.
LLM predicts next steps of some story, but there is no agent-like mind inside LLM which has plans how the story will develop. It is like self-evolving illusion, without director who plans how it will go.
Ok, but that doesn’t answer either question.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
In what sense do they not have creators, and in what sense are they simulations?
Note that this kind of argument https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/MmmPyJicaaJRk4Eg2/the-limit-of-language-models
...doesn’t show that LLMs are simulations in the sense of containing sentient beings.
LLM predicts next steps of some story, but there is no agent-like mind inside LLM which has plans how the story will develop. It is like self-evolving illusion, without director who plans how it will go.
Ok, but that doesn’t answer either question.