Thanks for the feedback. Just so I can get an approximate idea if this is the consensus: could people upvote this comment if you like the title as is (and upvote mingyuan’s comment if you think it should be changed)? Thanks!
Also, if anyone has a good title suggestion, I’d love to hear it!
Thanks! I’ve changed the title to “Great minds might not think alike”.
Interestingly, when I asked my Twitter followers, they liked “Alike minds think great”. I think LessWrong might be a different population. So I decided to change the title on LessWrong, but not on my blog.
(Systematically) Overestimating the effectiveness of similarity*
*This one points towards possibilities like
1. people aren’t evaluating ‘how good/effective is (someone else)’ but ‘how well would I work with them’, or 2. something about the way ‘the value of similar contributions’ is valued.
Thanks for the feedback. Just so I can get an approximate idea if this is the consensus: could people upvote this comment if you like the title as is (and upvote mingyuan’s comment if you think it should be changed)? Thanks!
Also, if anyone has a good title suggestion, I’d love to hear it!
Here are some possibilities:
great minds might not think alike
untranslated thinking sounds untrustworthy
disagreement as a lack of translation
Thanks! I’ve changed the title to “Great minds might not think alike”.
Interestingly, when I asked my Twitter followers, they liked “Alike minds think great”. I think LessWrong might be a different population. So I decided to change the title on LessWrong, but not on my blog.
I love ” great minds might not think alike”
Alike minds think they think great.
Alike minds think alike minds think great.
(Systematically) Overestimating the effectiveness of similarity*
*This one points towards possibilities like
1. people aren’t evaluating ‘how good/effective is (someone else)’ but ‘how well would I work with them’, or 2. something about the way ‘the value of similar contributions’ is valued.
These seem testable.