Typos:
a second the entrance → a second entrance
“Lumos,** Luna said. → “Lumos,”
Luna followed the right wall until her until she bumped → right wall until she bumped
could talk to the Slytherin’s basilisk → to Slytherin’s basilisk
Parselmouthes → Parselmouths
The only thing he would know is about the Heir of Slytherin was that she: → ??
Labrynth → Labyrinth
Ravenclas → Ravenclaw
Tenses:
so that you don’t get a Gryffindor → didn’t get
Parselmouthes are not special.-> were not special
They do not have secondary characteristics. → did not
Fixed. Thanks.
Also “had slayed” I think should be “had slain”. Here and also at “slayed Slytherin’s basilisk”.
It seems “slain” and “slayed” are both valid as the past principle of slay, though I did have the same thought before I looked it up.
From the linked article:
The alternative past tense and past participle form “slayed” is most strongly associated with the slang sense, “to delight or overwhelm”:
In recent use, “slayed” is also often found associated with the other senses as well. However, this is widely considered nonstandard
Typos:
a second the entrance → a second entrance
“Lumos,** Luna said. → “Lumos,”
Luna followed the right wall until her until she bumped → right wall until she bumped
could talk to the Slytherin’s basilisk → to Slytherin’s basilisk
Parselmouthes → Parselmouths
The only thing he would know is about the Heir of Slytherin was that she: → ??
Labrynth → Labyrinth
Ravenclas → Ravenclaw
Tenses:
so that you don’t get a Gryffindor → didn’t get
Parselmouthes are not special.-> were not special
They do not have secondary characteristics. → did not
Fixed. Thanks.
Also “had slayed” I think should be “had slain”. Here and also at “slayed Slytherin’s basilisk”.
It seems “slain” and “slayed” are both valid as the past principle of slay, though I did have the same thought before I looked it up.
From the linked article: