(Interestingly, seditious values deathist that I am, I am not inclined to believe in “terminal value” of ecologically-contingent approximations of actual morality (i.e., the actually justified decision policy, i.e., God); but God seems to care about those hasty approximations on their own terms, and so I end up caring, by transitivity, about me qua me and individuals qua individuals. So the humanist and the theist end up in the same non-Buddhist place. Ave meta!)
Such comments remind me of Time Cube with a dash of sanity, if only you would strip out the nonsense words (about 90 percent of the content) and clearly define everything that’s left.
I think it’s clearly not nonsense, but deserves to be downvoted anyway for casually assuming weird god stuff that he hasn’t really properly explained anywhere. Still interesting to the W_N connoiseur, and the parentheses are a mitigating factor.
(Interestingly, seditious values deathist that I am, I am not inclined to believe in “terminal value” of ecologically-contingent approximations of actual morality (i.e., the actually justified decision policy, i.e., God); but God seems to care about those hasty approximations on their own terms, and so I end up caring, by transitivity, about me qua me and individuals qua individuals. So the humanist and the theist end up in the same non-Buddhist place. Ave meta!)
Such comments remind me of Time Cube with a dash of sanity, if only you would strip out the nonsense words (about 90 percent of the content) and clearly define everything that’s left.
I think it’s clearly not nonsense, but deserves to be downvoted anyway for casually assuming weird god stuff that he hasn’t really properly explained anywhere. Still interesting to the W_N connoiseur, and the parentheses are a mitigating factor.