Another way to put this is that posts should often discuss their limitations, particular when debunking bad arguments that are similar to more reasonable arguments.
I think discussing limitations clearly is a reasonable norm for scientific papers that reduces the extent to which people intentionally or unintentionally get away with implying their results prove more than they do.
Another way to put this is that posts should often discuss their limitations, particular when debunking bad arguments that are similar to more reasonable arguments.
I think discussing limitations clearly is a reasonable norm for scientific papers that reduces the extent to which people intentionally or unintentionally get away with implying their results prove more than they do.