My comment was addressed only to what the community aesthetic is (was?), and not what it ought to be. I deliberately phrased the comment in the past tense to allow for a response like “well, maybe we should change that standard”.
The comment you linked to talks exactly about what the community behavior should be, one person’s opinion, or an observation about a different community’s aesthetics.
My comment was addressed only to what the community aesthetic is (was?), and not what it ought to be. I deliberately phrased the comment in the past tense to allow for a response like “well, maybe we should change that standard”.
The comment you linked to talks exactly about what the community behavior should be, one person’s opinion, or an observation about a different community’s aesthetics.
I don’t see how a post written by a single author that didn’t reflect the actual practice or survey of opinion can serve that purpose.