Philosophy largely isn’t about uninterpreted reality, it is largely about how humans think about and relate to reality. And each other. And thought itself.
Eg: “Is Logical Positivism a good idea?”. Answer: no.
Philosophy has yet to answer what “good” or “idea” even mean with authority, so I’m gonna say no to this, although I don’t disagree with your overall assertion.
I don’t think the fine details of “good” and “idea” are relevant. What’ relevant is that no-one does LP any more, and even its former adherents turned against it.
.
Philosophy largely isn’t about uninterpreted reality, it is largely about how humans think about and relate to reality. And each other. And thought itself.
.
From whom? Do you know of some people who understand philosophy and can do it better than philosophers, but aren’t philosphers?
I find that imprecise. Did you mean conceptual or numerical precision?
.
It isn’t becuase it isn’t just a vaguer way of addressing the same questions.
coming up with questions for philosphy to answer, teaching advanced question-ansering skills, etc.
.
Yes. Eg: “Is Logical Positivism a good idea?”. Answer: no.
Philosophy has yet to answer what “good” or “idea” even mean with authority, so I’m gonna say no to this, although I don’t disagree with your overall assertion.
I don’t think the fine details of “good” and “idea” are relevant. What’ relevant is that no-one does LP any more, and even its former adherents turned against it.