Eg: “Is Logical Positivism a good idea?”. Answer: no.
Philosophy has yet to answer what “good” or “idea” even mean with authority, so I’m gonna say no to this, although I don’t disagree with your overall assertion.
I don’t think the fine details of “good” and “idea” are relevant. What’ relevant is that no-one does LP any more, and even its former adherents turned against it.
From whom? Do you know of some people who understand philosophy and can do it better than philosophers, but aren’t philosphers?
I find that imprecise. Did you mean conceptual or numerical precision?
.
It isn’t becuase it isn’t just a vaguer way of addressing the same questions.
coming up with questions for philosphy to answer, teaching advanced question-ansering skills, etc.
.
Yes. Eg: “Is Logical Positivism a good idea?”. Answer: no.
Philosophy has yet to answer what “good” or “idea” even mean with authority, so I’m gonna say no to this, although I don’t disagree with your overall assertion.
I don’t think the fine details of “good” and “idea” are relevant. What’ relevant is that no-one does LP any more, and even its former adherents turned against it.