I’m surprised to find people questioning the importance of the relation between faith and reason. It’s the central issue in the debate between religion and rationality. Google faith vs. reason and start reading if you’re unaware of this tradition.
Maybe people mapping this post to some sort of religious apologia?
Who cares? Reason won. Next!
It’s the central issue in the debate between religion and rationality.
There is no debate between religion and rationality.
Don’t understand the downvotes. This is correct. There is no debate between gambling advice and probability theory, either.
Don’t understand the downvotes.
Vladimir_Nesov appears to be trying to sound deep by asserting that a piece of conventional wisdom is false without providing any kind of explanation.
This is correct. There is no debate between gambling advice and probability theory, either.
I don’t understand this analogy.
Gambling advice is based on probability theory, so the analogy seems to be saying that religion is based on rationality.
Not the gambling advice that has been offered to me.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
I’m surprised to find people questioning the importance of the relation between faith and reason. It’s the central issue in the debate between religion and rationality. Google faith vs. reason and start reading if you’re unaware of this tradition.
Maybe people mapping this post to some sort of religious apologia?
Who cares? Reason won. Next!
There is no debate between religion and rationality.
Don’t understand the downvotes. This is correct. There is no debate between gambling advice and probability theory, either.
Vladimir_Nesov appears to be trying to sound deep by asserting that a piece of conventional wisdom is false without providing any kind of explanation.
I don’t understand this analogy.
Gambling advice is based on probability theory, so the analogy seems to be saying that religion is based on rationality.
Not the gambling advice that has been offered to me.