Go to Azkaban and round up a few hundred dementors.
Harry would never use dementors as his army.
Bringing Hermione under the aegis of a noble house
Adoption or marriage
Problem one, Dumbledore is Harry’s legal guardian and would need to approve such acts. Problem two, there is then a blood debt from House Potter to House Malfoy, so maybe Harry has his wand snapped instead of Hermione, and how is that any better?
I’m assuming that the evidentiary standards are higher for conflicts between noble houses
I’m getting the sense there isn’t an evidentiary standard at all, not in any case. Each side argues their case and presents whatever evidence they like, and then the Wizengamot votes whatever the hell they feel like, nonwithstanding evidence to the contrary. Remember what Draco told Potter back at the train station: the Malfoys can get out of any accusations before the Wizengamot, like a non-noble accusing Draco of rape, simply because they’ve got the votes. Or the case with clearing Hagrid of blame: Quirrel said it would go ahead “because Lucius would have no reason to oppose it” (my words).
If it were that easy, Lucius couldn’t contest Dumbledore politically. I suppose the Wizengamot would have to rule to adjudicate by combat, and they won’t in an apparently clearcut murder attempt case.
Fate/Stay Night comes up in MoR as the franchise whose Fuyuki City trips up Quirrel in the interrogation*; the ‘Heaven’s Feel’ route is one possible plot in the FSN franchise. Plot summary, ref is probably to evil-Sakura’s ‘army of shadows’, which matches up well with Dementors.
* I looked it up, and Quirrel’s visit there in 1983 or whatever would have coincided with the birth of a few minor characters but nothing else important in the FSN universe, as far as I could tell.
Harry would never use dementors as his army.
Problem one, Dumbledore is Harry’s legal guardian and would need to approve such acts. Problem two, there is then a blood debt from House Potter to House Malfoy, so maybe Harry has his wand snapped instead of Hermione, and how is that any better?
I’m assuming that the evidentiary standards are higher for conflicts between noble houses. I could also imagine a trial by combat alternative.
As much as I’d love it, there’s no chance of a trial by combat. “If we did it your way, Kingslayer, you’d win. We’re not doing it your way.”
I’m getting the sense there isn’t an evidentiary standard at all, not in any case. Each side argues their case and presents whatever evidence they like, and then the Wizengamot votes whatever the hell they feel like, nonwithstanding evidence to the contrary. Remember what Draco told Potter back at the train station: the Malfoys can get out of any accusations before the Wizengamot, like a non-noble accusing Draco of rape, simply because they’ve got the votes. Or the case with clearing Hagrid of blame: Quirrel said it would go ahead “because Lucius would have no reason to oppose it” (my words).
What, Lord (Harry) Potter against Lord Lucius Malfoy? What a fine trial by combat that would be.
No, they’d be allowed champions, and Dumbledore would win.
If it were that easy, Lucius couldn’t contest Dumbledore politically. I suppose the Wizengamot would have to rule to adjudicate by combat, and they won’t in an apparently clearcut murder attempt case.
Well, for underage wizards, they get a champion, obviously. Dumbledore or Quirrel, I’d assume.
Before the Heaven’s Feel arc, you mean.
Can somebody dereference “Heaven’s Feel arc” for those of us who aren’t familiar with it?
Fate/Stay Night comes up in MoR as the franchise whose Fuyuki City trips up Quirrel in the interrogation*; the ‘Heaven’s Feel’ route is one possible plot in the FSN franchise. Plot summary, ref is probably to evil-Sakura’s ‘army of shadows’, which matches up well with Dementors.
* I looked it up, and Quirrel’s visit there in 1983 or whatever would have coincided with the birth of a few minor characters but nothing else important in the FSN universe, as far as I could tell.