For many terms that are relevant (Bayesanism, rationality), LW is already on the top set of Google hits. So I don’t know how much return this sort of thing would get.
People don’t search for terms like Bayesian or rationality. What they search for is answers to specific questions—which we don’t actually ever come up in searches for.
I’ve looked at the analytics and I know. Most people coming to Less Wrong through searches are clearly regular users trying to find specific articles or just using the search bar as a URL bar (so they don’t have to remember if it’s less wrong dot com or dot org or whatever).
For many terms that are relevant (Bayesanism, rationality), LW is already on the top set of Google hits. So I don’t know how much return this sort of thing would get.
People don’t search for terms like Bayesian or rationality. What they search for is answers to specific questions—which we don’t actually ever come up in searches for.
I’ve looked at the analytics and I know. Most people coming to Less Wrong through searches are clearly regular users trying to find specific articles or just using the search bar as a URL bar (so they don’t have to remember if it’s less wrong dot com or dot org or whatever).