It would be sheer insanity to have a rule that you can’t vote on your own removal, I would think, or else a tied board will definitely shrink right away.
Wait, simple majority is an insane place to put the threshold for removal in the first place. Majoritarian shrinking is still basically inevitable if the threshold for removal is 50%, it should be a higher than that, maybe 62%.
And generally, if 50% of a group thinks A and 50% thinks ¬A, that tells you that the group is not ready to make a decision about A.
It would be sheer insanity to have a rule that you can’t vote on your own removal, I would think, or else a tied board will definitely shrink right away.
Wait, simple majority is an insane place to put the threshold for removal in the first place. Majoritarian shrinking is still basically inevitable if the threshold for removal is 50%, it should be a higher than that, maybe 62%.
And generally, if 50% of a group thinks A and 50% thinks ¬A, that tells you that the group is not ready to make a decision about A.