If I recall correctly it seemed that you mostly argued for an objective morality instead of using it as the (explicit or implicit) linchpin of a larger argument. The former is well and good but the latter is irritating (e.g. “Deity X must exist because there is an objective morality”).
If that’s what was meant, then it shouldn’t appear as a separate item in a list that also contains the unrelated injunction against easy solutions to FAI.
If I recall correctly it seemed that you mostly argued for an objective morality instead of using it as the (explicit or implicit) linchpin of a larger argument. The former is well and good but the latter is irritating (e.g. “Deity X must exist because there is an objective morality”).
If that’s what was meant, then it shouldn’t appear as a separate item in a list that also contains the unrelated injunction against easy solutions to FAI.