The problem is, Fawkes fits a little too well into the Spaceballs maxim—“Evil will always prevail, because good is dumb”. Fawkes certainly has a purity of intent that’d put any of the human characters to shame, but the consequences are not always quite so good as would be hoped.
(Incidentally, the comparison you drew makes me notice something—if Harry is searching for eternal life, there’s a path to resurrection that neither MoR!Harry nor canon!Voldemort has noticed—phoenixes seem pretty good at that sort of thing. Mentioning them as an absolute contrast to dementors makes me wonder just how strong an antithesis they actually are, and if that might be an answer.)
Fawkes certainly has a purity of intent that’d put any of the human characters to shame, but the consequences are not always quite so good as would be hoped.
This is not a problem. Dementors are also not particularly cunning; there are other players.
I’m confused. I may misunderstand you. Your second sentence seems to support that it would be evidence against, but I read your first as incredulous of my question.
ETA: Nevermind. I understand now. I did not phrase my question well. I meant WOG against the people that you are disagreeing with in the comment.
I don’t think Eliezer meant that they’re necessarily sapient, only in the sense that one might say “slavery is evil” or (closer to the point) “death is evil”.
Dementors are just evil. Fawkes is just good.
The problem is, Fawkes fits a little too well into the Spaceballs maxim—“Evil will always prevail, because good is dumb”. Fawkes certainly has a purity of intent that’d put any of the human characters to shame, but the consequences are not always quite so good as would be hoped.
(Incidentally, the comparison you drew makes me notice something—if Harry is searching for eternal life, there’s a path to resurrection that neither MoR!Harry nor canon!Voldemort has noticed—phoenixes seem pretty good at that sort of thing. Mentioning them as an absolute contrast to dementors makes me wonder just how strong an antithesis they actually are, and if that might be an answer.)
This is not a problem. Dementors are also not particularly cunning; there are other players.
I think I viewed them more as forces than people. But is this WOG against the people pedanterrific refers to in this comment?
Against? How could a thing be pure evil if it’s controlled by people’s expectations of its behavior?
I’m confused. I may misunderstand you. Your second sentence seems to support that it would be evidence against, but I read your first as incredulous of my question.
ETA: Nevermind. I understand now. I did not phrase my question well. I meant WOG against the people that you are disagreeing with in the comment.
When you said this, did you mean my theory of independent decision making, or what I referred to as Harry’s initial hypothesis?
I’ve edited my initial query to make it clear.
I don’t think Eliezer meant that they’re necessarily sapient, only in the sense that one might say “slavery is evil” or (closer to the point) “death is evil”.