You abused passive voice too much. In the following examples, you made it unclear who suggested these ideas and whether the guild council agrees with them and plans to implement them.
For the Beta Phase, it is recommended that the Guild leadership structure be reorganized such that each Guild Council member is assigned a specific administrative role, and that participation and contribution be compensated either monetarily or with ownership equity.
It was recommended that all courses begin with a questionnaire to determine each student’s background knowledge and competency in the course domain.
It was suggested that a professional fashion expert be paid to give feedback at specific junctures to avoid groupthink and also enhance perceived credibility.
It was suggested that this class could benefit from some social manipulation games or inter-cohort competitions, potentially with prizes.
I do not love passive voice either, but the nature of this document is:
We have collected feedback from stakeholders in the form of interviews, and consolidated that feedback in this document.
If there is ever a place for passive voice, it is a document whose purpose is to consolidate the opinions of multiple people while explicitly not implying definite consensus among those people.
In a document that consolidates opinions of multiple people I think it’s useful to be specific about how many people propose an idea. Instead of “It was recommended” you could say “One person recommended” or whatever is the most appropriate. That would make it much more clear to the reader how much the recommendation is backed.
You abused passive voice too much. In the following examples, you made it unclear who suggested these ideas and whether the guild council agrees with them and plans to implement them.
I do not love passive voice either, but the nature of this document is:
If there is ever a place for passive voice, it is a document whose purpose is to consolidate the opinions of multiple people while explicitly not implying definite consensus among those people.
In a document that consolidates opinions of multiple people I think it’s useful to be specific about how many people propose an idea. Instead of “It was recommended” you could say “One person recommended” or whatever is the most appropriate. That would make it much more clear to the reader how much the recommendation is backed.