Another way of putting this is that argument screens off authority.
It’s not that appeals to authority are invalid—it’s that I already understand the arguments that make these authorities endorse two-boxing, so (non-neglibly) updating based on the authorities and the arguments would be double-counting that evidence.
Another way of putting this is that argument screens off authority.
It’s not that appeals to authority are invalid—it’s that I already understand the arguments that make these authorities endorse two-boxing, so (non-neglibly) updating based on the authorities and the arguments would be double-counting that evidence.