a) You’ve figured out a way to summon demons and want to destroy your own credibility so that people don’t flow the train of thought in your old posts and figure it out also. If so all I can say is that security by obscurity generally doesn’t work.
b) You’re getting possessed by demons and what to destroy your credibility to minimize the damage possessed!Will can do.
Getting possessed by demons sounds harder, in that context. I can compile simple algorithms to my brain and, say, sort an ordered set of stuff faster than I could have before I learned any programming. But that’s about my limit. I know you’re a few standard deviations up at mental modeling, but are you good enough to become possessed?
Maybe not me, I’m not an AI programmer. A friend of mine has been AIXI for a few hours though, after taking certain substances at a certain famous event in a certain famous desert.
Of course, I am only shooting in the dark, but do you think you may have been uncurious because your learning what he witnessed was correlated with an event that a nearby Power deemed insufficiently utilicious?
A discussion of why alcoholic spirits are called spirits was actually in my most recent comptheology post, but I cut it because it was off-topic. I’d like to hammer on that theme a little more though—i.e. how in the past people were just not that individualistic, and being influenced by spirits of any kind wasn’t abnormal. I suspect it is very different to live with those inductive biases.
Some theories:
a) You’ve figured out a way to summon demons and want to destroy your own credibility so that people don’t flow the train of thought in your old posts and figure it out also. If so all I can say is that security by obscurity generally doesn’t work.
b) You’re getting possessed by demons and what to destroy your credibility to minimize the damage possessed!Will can do.
Summoning demons ain’t that hard, just hone your mathy AI and Hofstadter skills and find a silicon ritual device.
Even denying stuff gives too much evidence (correctly assuming people mostly believe such denials).
We should talk privately if we’re to get into any real discussion. No promises of anything, of course.
Getting possessed by demons sounds harder, in that context. I can compile simple algorithms to my brain and, say, sort an ordered set of stuff faster than I could have before I learned any programming. But that’s about my limit. I know you’re a few standard deviations up at mental modeling, but are you good enough to become possessed?
Maybe not me, I’m not an AI programmer. A friend of mine has been AIXI for a few hours though, after taking certain substances at a certain famous event in a certain famous desert.
Well, don’t leave us twisting in the wind, Will—what did he witness?
Alas, for some reason I wasn’t very curious about his experience. I don’t even know which variation on AIXI he was.
Of course, I am only shooting in the dark, but do you think you may have been uncurious because your learning what he witnessed was correlated with an event that a nearby Power deemed insufficiently utilicious?
Heh, I’ll bet the Bayesian Conspiracy camp was a lot of fun. Hopefully he didn’t start eating his own head for more computational resources.
I suspect it involves taking various mind-altering substances.
Well, he has spoken of letting himself be influenced by spirits.
A discussion of why alcoholic spirits are called spirits was actually in my most recent comptheology post, but I cut it because it was off-topic. I’d like to hammer on that theme a little more though—i.e. how in the past people were just not that individualistic, and being influenced by spirits of any kind wasn’t abnormal. I suspect it is very different to live with those inductive biases.
I liked that. The historic support is good evidence for your model of people as running different copies of the same algorithms.