I mean, I get why Newsome would want to obscure this: a lot of people get off on being seen as “mysterious” or whatever. But there does seem to be a number of people here who understand what is going on, but are refusing to offer their explanations, in spite of the fact that a lot of people are confused here.
Maybe they take the basilisk threat seriously? That would be crazy/sad if true.
Edit: Also, there are now a number of people openly asking for explanations, but all we are getting is speculation from people who also don’t know what is going on. I’m starting to get annoyed with this.
But there does seem to be a number of people here who understand what is going on, but are refusing to offer their explanations, in spite of the fact that a lot of people are confused here.
Maybe they take the basilisk threat seriously?
Just don’t be fooled by intelligence too much. Just because those people can disgorge some math that doesn’t lent their extraordinary claims much credence. Most of the credence they assign is based on mutual reassurance anyway. Just like a bunch of ufologists updating on each others evidence of alien abductions.
Just like a bunch of ufologists updating on each others evidence of alien abductions.
Given normal assumptions, additional claims of abductions should provide additional evidence. I don’t think you’ve quite pinned downed the error with your example.
I mean, I get why Newsome would want to obscure this: a lot of people get off on being seen as “mysterious” or whatever. But there does seem to be a number of people here who understand what is going on, but are refusing to offer their explanations, in spite of the fact that a lot of people are confused here.
Maybe they take the basilisk threat seriously? That would be crazy/sad if true.
Edit: Also, there are now a number of people openly asking for explanations, but all we are getting is speculation from people who also don’t know what is going on. I’m starting to get annoyed with this.
Just don’t be fooled by intelligence too much. Just because those people can disgorge some math that doesn’t lent their extraordinary claims much credence. Most of the credence they assign is based on mutual reassurance anyway. Just like a bunch of ufologists updating on each others evidence of alien abductions.
Given normal assumptions, additional claims of abductions should provide additional evidence. I don’t think you’ve quite pinned downed the error with your example.