Conflict (Fire) can only birth resolve. Divine intervention now, at this point, LW seems to be seeking a much higher purpose for the Creator to take note. New to LW, and there seems to be some sort of spiritual battle (wars have existed since the initiation of time) here. God vs. ___ This is good for sharpening both the mind and whatever else exist within self.
I know, I’m sorry. But it’s extremely efficient for my purposes, moreso than more entertaining alternatives. Next time, though, I’ll do something good.
Will, the statement above, is response to the cruelty, and disrespect of sandwich, in his posting calling out with little information about belief systems to go as far by naming individuals idiots. I’m sorry for the closed minds in which you group and effort to communicate rationally (without emotions,) it seems you have lit or hit or sparked something in these subjects allowing caused or un-caused, controlled or controlled emotions. Their must be something deeper in these subjects to carry on, and display themselves here as such. Your motivation Will, I am still pondering, collecting data, that I can draw out a smart conclusion. But for sandwich to lose control and refer me as an idiot, this I do not understand his and colleagues motivation. Sandwich did say prospect though, but for sandwich to be deeply disturbed [(feelings, deep thoughts, possible bitterness, (no love)] again the motivation and intent is unclear. i do not know enough about sandwich to draw an conclusion. I must gather more data. Good Day.
You’re posting this here is strange, because the incident you’re referring to happened elsewhere in the comments section, and I was only indirectly involved with it. But if I had to guess why you were implicitly called an “idiot”, it’d be down to two big, related things.
Firstly, you made a few errors of grammar and punctuation. This is likely due in part to hasty or stressed writing, but also somewhat suggests you don’t know the correct grammar and punctuation, which is a huge factor people take into account when judging intelligence and intellectual ability. Secondly, your writing style is distinctly schizophrenic, with overt religious influences. Both schizophrenia and religiosity are thought to correlate strongly with lack of intellectual ability on LessWrong.
Those two aspects of your writing combined—punctuation/grammar and schizotypality/religiosity—mean the vast majority of LessWrong folk won’t even bother to try to understand what you say, and will thus consign you to the “idiot” bin. Unfortunately, I think it’d be very difficult for you to learn the writing style and conceptual emphases that are sought on LessWrong.
Thus I think you’ll ultimately want to refrain from commenting here. Your ideas are interesting, but your background, perspective, and values are too different to spark really useful interactions. Even I am often disliked on LessWrong and I am very careful to speak their language most of the time. I think you’d fare much worse, because you lack the experience.
At least be more entertaining. This post is boring. And you exist for nothing but to make me chuckle at your quaint ideas.
How comes both the parent and the grandparent are upvoted this much?
Because they (and one more ancestor above) are awesome, lighthearted, and playfully satirical. I would upvote them again.
Is for trying to be funny and intellectually disciplined in same time, that Will stay here asking for a pool about our mental model of him.
Conflict (Fire) can only birth resolve. Divine intervention now, at this point, LW seems to be seeking a much higher purpose for the Creator to take note. New to LW, and there seems to be some sort of spiritual battle (wars have existed since the initiation of time) here. God vs. ___ This is good for sharpening both the mind and whatever else exist within self.
I am deeply distrubed by the prospect of idiots being drawn to LW because of Newsome.
8⁄10 if you are a troll.
Edit: Possible whoosh
I don’t understand your motivation-you were offended, so I shall retract in the name of LW and peace.
I know, I’m sorry. But it’s extremely efficient for my purposes, moreso than more entertaining alternatives. Next time, though, I’ll do something good.
Will, the statement above, is response to the cruelty, and disrespect of sandwich, in his posting calling out with little information about belief systems to go as far by naming individuals idiots. I’m sorry for the closed minds in which you group and effort to communicate rationally (without emotions,) it seems you have lit or hit or sparked something in these subjects allowing caused or un-caused, controlled or controlled emotions. Their must be something deeper in these subjects to carry on, and display themselves here as such. Your motivation Will, I am still pondering, collecting data, that I can draw out a smart conclusion. But for sandwich to lose control and refer me as an idiot, this I do not understand his and colleagues motivation. Sandwich did say prospect though, but for sandwich to be deeply disturbed [(feelings, deep thoughts, possible bitterness, (no love)] again the motivation and intent is unclear. i do not know enough about sandwich to draw an conclusion. I must gather more data. Good Day.
You’re posting this here is strange, because the incident you’re referring to happened elsewhere in the comments section, and I was only indirectly involved with it. But if I had to guess why you were implicitly called an “idiot”, it’d be down to two big, related things.
Firstly, you made a few errors of grammar and punctuation. This is likely due in part to hasty or stressed writing, but also somewhat suggests you don’t know the correct grammar and punctuation, which is a huge factor people take into account when judging intelligence and intellectual ability. Secondly, your writing style is distinctly schizophrenic, with overt religious influences. Both schizophrenia and religiosity are thought to correlate strongly with lack of intellectual ability on LessWrong.
Those two aspects of your writing combined—punctuation/grammar and schizotypality/religiosity—mean the vast majority of LessWrong folk won’t even bother to try to understand what you say, and will thus consign you to the “idiot” bin. Unfortunately, I think it’d be very difficult for you to learn the writing style and conceptual emphases that are sought on LessWrong.
Thus I think you’ll ultimately want to refrain from commenting here. Your ideas are interesting, but your background, perspective, and values are too different to spark really useful interactions. Even I am often disliked on LessWrong and I am very careful to speak their language most of the time. I think you’d fare much worse, because you lack the experience.