I don’t mind the idea of “hey, I’m publishing this, feel free to comment on it. I can add your comments.” I do mind the idea of “Hey, is there anything about this document you’d like me to edit before I criticize you?”
Hey, is there anything about this document you’d like me to edit before I criticize you?
I am 100% not advocating that! Giving the organization an opportunity to prepare a response is not the same thing as letting them decide or influence what your post says.
Sorry for ambiguity—here’s the version I mean to be endorsing by using strikethrough to denote sarcasm: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Hsix7D2rHyumLAAys/run-posts-by-orgs?commentId=5gGyLeDK4b6nWfbCt—the strikethrough is simply, in my head, the css style that a paragraph which is sarcastic should get. one should not leave paragraphs meant to be inverted un-struck, imo.
I don’t mind the idea of “hey, I’m publishing this, feel free to comment on it. I can add your comments.” I do mind the idea of “Hey, is there anything about this document you’d like me to edit before I criticize you?”
I am 100% not advocating that! Giving the organization an opportunity to prepare a response is not the same thing as letting them decide or influence what your post says.
Hmm. I see.