Can you say more about what seems ‘yikes’ about defaulting to giving orgs (or individuals) you’re criticizing a few days to prepare a response?
(It’s hard for me to see how to take your stricken initial paragraph, since you said below that you didn’t mean it, but it sort of seems like you do mean it?)
I don’t mind the idea of “hey, I’m publishing this, feel free to comment on it. I can add your comments.” I do mind the idea of “Hey, is there anything about this document you’d like me to edit before I criticize you?”
Hey, is there anything about this document you’d like me to edit before I criticize you?
I am 100% not advocating that! Giving the organization an opportunity to prepare a response is not the same thing as letting them decide or influence what your post says.
Can you say more about what seems ‘yikes’ about defaulting to giving orgs (or individuals) you’re criticizing a few days to prepare a response?
(It’s hard for me to see how to take your stricken initial paragraph, since you said below that you didn’t mean it, but it sort of seems like you do mean it?)
Sorry for ambiguity—here’s the version I mean to be endorsing by using strikethrough to denote sarcasm: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Hsix7D2rHyumLAAys/run-posts-by-orgs?commentId=5gGyLeDK4b6nWfbCt—the strikethrough is simply, in my head, the css style that a paragraph which is sarcastic should get. one should not leave paragraphs meant to be inverted un-struck, imo.
I don’t mind the idea of “hey, I’m publishing this, feel free to comment on it. I can add your comments.” I do mind the idea of “Hey, is there anything about this document you’d like me to edit before I criticize you?”
I am 100% not advocating that! Giving the organization an opportunity to prepare a response is not the same thing as letting them decide or influence what your post says.
Hmm. I see.