To be clear, I think the bare-bones morality in that post comes from “observe boundaries and then try not to violate them” (or, in Davidad’s case: and then proactively defend them (which is stronger)).
I’ll need to think about the rest of your comment more, hm. If you think of examples please lmk:) Also, wdym that a logical dependency could be itself a membrane? Eg?
One thing— I think the «membranes/boundaries» generator would probably reject the “you get to choose worlds” premise, for that choice is not within your «membrane/boundary». Instead, there’s a more decentralized (albeit much smaller) thing that is within your «membrane» that you do have control over. (Similar example here wrt to Alex, global poverty, and his donations.)
To be clear, I think the bare-bones morality in that post comes from “observe boundaries and then try not to violate them” (or, in Davidad’s case: and then proactively defend them (which is stronger)).
I’ll need to think about the rest of your comment more, hm. If you think of examples please lmk:)
Also, wdym that a logical dependency could be itself a membrane? Eg?
One thing— I think the «membranes/boundaries» generator would probably reject the “you get to choose worlds” premise, for that choice is not within your «membrane/boundary». Instead, there’s a more decentralized (albeit much smaller) thing that is within your «membrane» that you do have control over. (Similar example here wrt to Alex, global poverty, and his donations.)