I’m curious if they’ve sanitized their inputs on the back end. Interestingly, you seem to be able to vote for arbitrarily high numbers or arbitrarily small ones and get the same response as a real vote. I tested, and lets just say that unless they’ve got more than 100,000 voters, the correct number may end up being well above 100 from that vote alone.
This is an interesting experiment. I just hope they’ve accounted for little bobby tables.
Interestingly, you seem to be able to vote for arbitrarily high numbers or arbitrarily small ones and get the same response as a real vote. I tested, and lets just say that unless they’ve got more than 100,000 voters, the correct number may end up being well above 100 from that vote alone.
Hope they don’t take that seriously, or else the correct number is now essentially 3↑↑↑3, as that’s what I voted for.
I’m curious if they’ve sanitized their inputs on the back end. Interestingly, you seem to be able to vote for arbitrarily high numbers or arbitrarily small ones and get the same response as a real vote. I tested, and lets just say that unless they’ve got more than 100,000 voters, the correct number may end up being well above 100 from that vote alone.
This is an interesting experiment. I just hope they’ve accounted for little bobby tables.
Hope they don’t take that seriously, or else the correct number is now essentially 3↑↑↑3, as that’s what I voted for.
I doubt that it parsed it correctly, their database probably can’t store the number 3↑↑↑3 represents the way it stores other numbers.