Is human morality, then, in some deep sense better than those?
No. The point of meta-ethics as outlined on LW is that there is no “deeper sense”, no outside perspective from which to judge moral views against one another.
What would “deeper sense” even mean? Human morality is better (or h-better, whichever terminology you prefer), that’s all there is to it.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
No. The point of meta-ethics as outlined on LW is that there is no “deeper sense”, no outside perspective from which to judge moral views against one another.
What would “deeper sense” even mean? Human morality is better (or h-better, whichever terminology you prefer), that’s all there is to it.