that does not mean that every statement I make about my own utility function must be suspect
In general, unless something is well-understood, there is good reason to suspect an error. Human values is not something that’s understood particularly well.
In general, unless something is well-understood, there is good reason to suspect an error. Human values is not something that’s understood particularly well.
If you value e.g. your family extremely higher than a grain of salt, would you say that there is any chance of that not being reflected in your CEV?
Any “CEV” that doesn’t conserve e.g. that particular relationship would be misnamed.