I’d generally say that, but wouldn’t be surprised if there were some who disagreed; who’s argument would be something like what-to-me would sound like a modification of utilitarianism, [utilitarianism+epistemic-terminal-values].
If you have epistemic terminal values then it would not be a positive expected value trade, would it? Unless “expected value” is referring to the expected value of something other than your utility function, in which case it should’ve been specified.
I was doing what may be a poor steelman of my assumptions of how others would disagree; I don’t have a great sense of what people who would disagree would say at this point.
I’d generally say that, but wouldn’t be surprised if there were some who disagreed; who’s argument would be something like what-to-me would sound like a modification of utilitarianism, [utilitarianism+epistemic-terminal-values].
If you have epistemic terminal values then it would not be a positive expected value trade, would it? Unless “expected value” is referring to the expected value of something other than your utility function, in which case it should’ve been specified.
Yep, I would generally think so.
I was doing what may be a poor steelman of my assumptions of how others would disagree; I don’t have a great sense of what people who would disagree would say at this point.
Happiness + Knowledge. (A related question is, do people with these values drink?)